Sunday, January 15, 2023

State of the Union Report for Jericho, Vermont 2021-2022

Contents
  • Why show these measurable data elements.
  • Recommendation (to S.B.& Town Mgr.) to include these statistics in the Jericho Annual Town Meeting Report. 
  1. Grand List Number of units 
  2. Building Permits Issued by year
    1. Density per unit
    2. Residential building types estimates
    3. Housing Stats
    4. Relationship between growth (new development) and the property tax rate
    5. FOR DISCUSSION -  Further analysis and critique of possible town tax burden impacts of new development. See line item 2.3 under the heading Building Permits Issued.
  3. Grand List categorized by acreage and # of parcels
  4. Agricultural Land (Work in progress)
    1. Geography (Area: land, water)
  5. Acres Conserved
  6. Area of land suitable for housing development (TBD)
  7. Water Capacity (TBD)
  8. Population (historical and current)
  9. School Enrollment, capacity, (the basis for enrollment projections)
  10. Biodiversity of Jericho
  11. Optional statistics recommended for listing
  12. Resources utilized for this report
  13. Town Maps

Given the changing dynamics of the Jericho town plan, and the community interest in reshaping how Jericho, Vermont is in part, developed, conserved preserved, and modified, the measurable numbers below (and those yet to be ferreted out) might be of interest. 

Thus I recommend these elements be reported each year in the town Annual Report as a sort of "State of the Union Address for Jericho, Vermont". I believe these are relevant historical and current elements that can help us recognize trends, and changes and where we are headed; improve our ability to see both the trees and the forest in our town plan and discussions therein. 

Read the Current Town Plant on the Jericho Town Web Site under the Planning Commission tab. 

The History of Jericho Vermont Vol III 2013 refers to a quote by Don Galusha in the 1930s, "Some day Jericho will be a suburb of Burlington." The book goes on to say, "In 1964, the Jericho planning board stated, "Recent factors which will complicate the development of our community are the proposed new union high school, the completion of the Montpelier-Burlington section of the throughway, and the influence of the IBM expansion. They also noted, "the trend for families to move to rural areas..."

In recognition and response to these changing conditions, zoning ordinances (1961), and planning positions were created, (1965), and a town comprehensive plan was developed (1968).

Now, in 2023, with global warming and climate change, a growing gap in wealth attainment, and housing shortages as well as ever more rare open land in surrounding towns, I wonder what Jericho will look like in fifty years. Will land development be viewed through a long-term lens and as a communal recipe? 

Are we viewing the tip of an iceberg of undeveloped and Agricultural land that is melting away before we recognize the extent and consider the long-term implications?  "When in crisis mode we tend to lose sight of the long term; we can act now, and act strategically". SJ Dube, Jericho Housing Committee Chair. 

What are the fundamental land use values of the Jericho community? How will we balance the needs, wants, and desires against the natural resources we have to steward for this generation and those to come?


As farmed food becomes more nutrient deficient* and supply struggles to meet demand, how will the capacity to grow local nutrient-rich foods factor into our land management decisions?  *Large-scale, industrial agriculture can deplete crops of essential vitamins and minerals that our bodies need to thrive. 

Transition Town Jericho will ask for support at the Town Meeting for this resolution: We the citizens of Jericho propose the formation of Jericho as a vital Food Hub for the citizens of its towns and environs. A Food Hub Commission will be established to increase food self-sufficiency via the production, manufacture, and distribution of local food.

Note: Bernie produced this report based on his research (see the sources at the end of this post). Please email Bernie with any corrections and sources of the correction. TY

   "State of the Union Report for Jericho, Vermont"


Recommendations:
1.) Include the measurable summary numbers of the categorized items listed below, in the Annual Town Report.

2.) Post preliminary, and final Budget Reports, Capitol Budget, and Town Annual Report online and keep records each year online going forward.

3) Include a comment section (brief notes) on the right side of the Budget Report line items. For example note the road salt per ton price, new truck purchase, Storm damage tree cutting, or other such information where the budget amount might draw questions, particularly where the year-to-year line item dollar amounts change considerably. See Underhill's Budget report as an example.

4.) I highly recommend a one-on-one or public discussion with the Jericho Affordable Housing Committee Chair, Sarahjane Dube. She listens, is articulate, willing to discuss feelings and facts about housing as well as practical considerations, creative applications, housing needs, and what your visions are for Jericho. I find her interested in weaving housing and conservation together, recognizing that Agriculture and open land is a central part of Jericho's identity. She encourages and supports diverse methods of public engagement. 

5.) Further analysis and critique of town tax burden impacts of new development. See line item 2.3 below.

 1) Number of units on the Grand List:  2,157 parcels                                          

     Households: 1,975 (1,761 owners, 214 renters)

    The average increase in Housing Stock: 0.54% (VT 0.60%)

    Median Home Sale Price: $429,750 (about $583k in the first half of 2022). Increased 71% over the last two years. In 2018 the median sale price in Jericho was $332k. 

    Median Gross Rent: $1,040


          Parcel Sizes
  •  200-300 acres: (12)
  • 100-199 acres:  (25)
  •  50-99 acres:     (32)
  • 1-49 acres:  (1960)
  • 300 to 367 (3)
  • 201 to 300 (7)
  • 151 to 200 (7)
  • 100 to 150 (18)
  • 78 to 100 acres (11)
  • 50 to 75 acres (22)
  • 25 to 49 acres (45)
  •  11 to 25 acres (134)
  •  10 to 10.9 acres (163)
  •  Less than 10 acres (1744)
  •         0 acres:   (128)

2.) Building permits issued  

   Recommendation:  Show in graph or chart form, the total number of units added annually for the previous year and for the past 30 years. 

The number of Building Permits Units: Total, Single-Family, Multi-Family buildings. 

Total 1,007 since 1980.

  • 2023
    •  (An 8 to 17 home development application for Gov Peck/Browns Trace is currently on the DRB docket as of Jan 17, 2023.)
    • A request to the DRB by Don & Bonnie Morin for a sketch review for the redevelopment of 37 River Road into a possible 8-lot subdivision with existing structures. The property is located at 37 River Road which is in the Rural Village Center District CD 4 Character Based Zoning District.
    • A request by Marjorie B Hunt Living Trust, Martha Prince for a final plat review for a proposed two-lot residential subdivision. The property is located at the Orr Road extension which is in the Village Zoning District.
  • 2022 (~12)
  • 2021 (18)  SFB 10, MFB 8
  • 2020 (18)  SFB 18 
  • 2019 (18)  SFB 18
  • 2018 (7)   SFB 7
  • 2017 (7)   SFB 7
  • 2016 (7)   SFB 7
  • 2015 (7)   SFB 7
  • 2014 (13)  SFB 13
  • 2013 (12)  SFB 12 
  • 2012 (8)    SFB 8
  • 2011 (7)   SFB 7
  • 2010 (5)   SFB 5
  • 2009 (2)   SFB 2
  • 2008 (10) SFB 10
  • 2007 (17) SFB 9,  MFB 8
  • 2006 (22) SFB 22
  • 2005 (17) SFB 15, MFB 2
  • 2004 (22) SFB 12, MFB 10
  • 2003 (14) SFB 14
  • 2002 (21) SFB 21
  • 2001 (14) SFB 14
  • 2000 (19) SFB 19
  • 1999 (29) SFB 29
  • 1998 (24) SFB 22, MFB 2
  • 1997 (16) SFB 16
  • 1996 (13) SFB 13
  • 1995 (30) SFB 30
  • 1994 (31) SFB 31
  • 1993 (54) SFB 46, MFB 8
  • 1992 (47) SFB 32, MFB 15
  • 1991 (36) SFB 36
  • 1990 (30) SFB 23, MFB 7
  • 1989 (22) SFB 15, MFB 7
  • 1988 (45) SFB 43, MFB 2
  • 1987 (26) SFB 26
  • 1986 (83) SFB 71, MFB 12
  • 1985 (67) SFB 42, MFB 25
  • 1984 (40) SFB 40
  • 1983 (27) SFB 27
  • 1982 (27) SFB 27
  • 1981 (29) SFB 29
  • 1980 (34) SFB 34
    • (Source for Developments built shown below: The History of Jericho VT Vol III) 
  • 2004 Tyler Place (25 homes).
  • 1997 Rogers Farm development on Route 117, the southern part of town, with about 20 homes.
  • Mid-1990s Outlook Vista Estates on former Bourgois farm (Packard rd), and Westin Development (Plains rd). 
  • 1980-1992* Sunwood (Packard rd). (70 homes including single-family, duplexes, and some townhouses).
    • *You have Sunwood listed as 1990. Our Sunwood home was built end of 1985/beginning of 1986 and there were houses in Sunwood that were 5 years older than ours, so I believe the development started closer to 1980. - Anonymous
  • 1992 Valley Edge on former Wheeler farm near the eastern end of Raceway.
  • 1980s Alpine Estates, Creekside (former Fay farm in Riverside part of town),  Mansfield Estate, Ayers Drive & Kettle Creek (near Jericho Center), Gabaree Lane, Cedar Circle, White Farm Meadow, Twin Meadow, Matts Meadow in the Jericho Corners section of town.
  • 1971 - 1980* Foothills off of the Raceway (Former Jeter farm)
    • *The Foothills began in the 1960s not the 1980s and the source is an invitation to the first model home which is still in our former milkhouse. The Bishop family started the Foothills and built it until they moved in the late 1960s. They lived in the house we now live in. - Catherine Stevens
  • 1975-1987 Jericho East, and commercial development along rt 15 (former Carpenter farm). 
  • 1976 Plains & Skunk Hollow (11 lots)
  • 1970s Pinehurst Dr (corner of Rte 15 and Packard rd). 
  • 1960s Skyview Drive (off Lee River road) and Sunny View Acres.  Mountain View, and Lawerence Heights (on part of Ramon Lawrence farm).
  • 1950s Lafayette Drive (on a loop off Lee River Road) (~25 homes)
2.1 Density per Unit

Year

All Buildings

Total Blgs Counting MFB as single units

Population

Approx. Density - People per unit

2022

12

2100



2021

18

2088

5082

2.43

2020

18

2070

5075

2.45

2019

18

2052

4994

2.43

2018

7

2034

5037

2.48

2017

7

2027

5064

2.50

2016

7

2020

5046

2.50

2015

7

2013

5070

2.52

2014

13

2006

5029

2.51

2013

12

1993

5027

2.52

2012

8

1981

5019

2.53

2011

7

1973

5032

2.55


* Note in the chart above, the MFB (Multi-family) buildings are counted as a single unit, therefore the density per unit is a ballpark figure.

The chart below accounts for Single-family buildings only. Again, neither chart is a totally accurate density since the number of units in each MFB is not known (to me). 

Year

SF Buildings only

Tot Bldgs SF ONLY

Population

Approx. Density - People per unit

2022

12

1989


 

2021

10

1977

5082

2.57

2020

18

1967

5075

2.58

2019

18

1949

4994

2.56

2018

7

1931

5037

2.61

2017

7

1924

5064

2.63

2016

7

1917

5046

2.63

2015

7

1910

5070

2.65

2014

13

1903

5029

2.64

2013

12

1890

5027

2.66

2012

8

1878

5019

2.67

2011

7

1870

5032

2.69


It would be interesting to know the average square footage of units (living space) per person. TBD

2.2). 2019 Data: Residential Building type estimates

  • Single-Family detached             1,727
  • Single-Family attached.               123
  • Multifamily building (2 units)          40
  • Multifamily building (3-4 units)      10
  • Multifamily building (5-9 units)      59
  • Multifamily building (10-19 units)  10
  • Mobile Home                                     83

                                              Total 2,052

2.3) Housing Stats (From Jericho Housing Committee 2/14/2023)

  • 16% of Jericho's residential buildings are something other than single-family, detached (in fact, 8 units in multi-family buildings in 2021 were permitted to build).
  • 20% of Jericho's occupied housing units are small (2 or fewer bedrooms)
  • 11% of Jericho's housing is rental... a rate that has not changed in over 4 decades. [Note that to stay at 11% over the years, the number of rental housing continued to increase].


2.4.) Relationship between growth (new development) and property tax rate. 

Questions for community discussion. 

What is the best use of the land: Housing, Economy, Infrastructure, or environment? (Poised by Susan at 2/7 P.C. mtg).

What is the delta or difference between the revenue and expense side of new development? 

How does one measure at what point new development drives town costs above the revenue the housing or commercial development brings in, resulting in an increased tax burden?

What is the dynamic of growth rates with respect to demand for services and infrastructure? Let me propose a starting point for discussion purposes; Let's assume that rural landowners extract $0.65 per dollar of taxes paid and urban/developed parcels require over $1.25 in municipal services in return for their tax dollars. 

If this is so, is this complex dynamic due to lax control of growth rates with respect to demand for services and infrastructure? 

Post Script: From a commentary in VT Digger by John Bossange. "“Carrying capacity” includes the impact of growth on schools, police, fire, public works, parks, intersections and traffic control, and many other essential services — like the ability to maintain adequate wastewater treatment and stormwater systems, provide enough fresh, clean drinking water, and enough expanded fossil fuel gas and electrical grids." 


Chuck Lacy advised that the State Education Tax on Jericho residents is affected by the number of students enrolled at MMU and the income of residents in the town. [Lower enrollments and higher incomes = likely higher education taxes].


2.5)  Tax burden discussion

  • What do newly developed parcels require in municipal services in return for their tax dollars? Can and is this measured by the development review board review of applications? Commercial as well as residential.
  • Postulate: The difference between rural and urban demand on tax revenue is largely explained by the increase in expectations of suburban residents outstripping the increase in revenue from taxing their bigger houses. Wealthy people from urban areas may be more likely to want paved streets and other amenities that are hard to afford at lower population densities and lower median incomes.
  • Preserve open land by limiting sprawl. Option for consideration: Have all new development be connected to municipal wastewater treatment and municipal water supply. Individual septic systems and wells are inefficient and facilitate people being scattered across the landscape. 
  • If the goal is to keep property taxes affordable, and address the climate crisis, encourage multi-family, multi-story residential development close to services. How? In part, not minimum lot sizes and single-family occupancy, but instead, set maximum lot sizes and graduated tax rates inversely proportional to occupancy.  Perhaps a tax rebate based on occupancy. Encouraging if not rewarding housemates, co-housing, multi-family units, and energy-efficient housing (the larger the house, the greater volume/surface ratio). 
  • What research can we utilize to assist in this analysis?

3.) Acreage by Grand List Category.  

      Category                  Acres - (Parcels)     Real Value from G.L.

  • Commercial                       669      (62)             $90,811,300     (11.3%)
  • Commercial Apts                   7        (2)                $1,139,700      (0.1%)
  • Misc* and other             4,571    (144)             $21,189,000     (2.6%)
  •  Misc (Firing Range)     5,074        (1)             $27,324,700.    (3.4%)
  • Mobile Home LA                 96      (16)              $3,087,500.     (0.4%)
  • Other mostly condos            7      (119)            $30,342,200.    (3.8%)
  • Residential <6 acres    2,247   (1,413)          $448,298,100   (55.7%)
  • Residential >6 acres.   8,073    (383)           $164,572,300    (20.4%)
  • Farm (Working farm)     974        (5)                $3,693,100.     (0.5%)
  • Utilities, Other                       3      (12)             $15,046,900.      (1.9%)
  • TOTAL                           21, 721    (2,157)     $805,504,800        (100%)

  Note: *acreage and other misc types.



4.) Number of acres of Agricultural land* 

Agricultural and open spaces are a central part of Jericho's identity.

AG land - a small piece of pie broken up into many slices and facing orders from many customers with varying usage appetites. 

*I am still working to figure out how to ferret out the acreage numbers from the town map. 

  • 3a) Number of acres of undeveloped AG land (To be determined)
  • 3b) Number of acres of partially developed AG land (TBD) 
    • Examples: cemetery and elementary school on RTE 15.    
  • 3c) Number of acres of Ag land currently being used for Agricultural purposes (To be determined)
  • 3d) Number of acres of Ag land that are conserved (To be determined)
  • 3e) Farms operating in Jericho 1960s about 55 farms; by 2013 (2), 2022(2). 



Note 3: Unfortunately on the Jericho Town Website Map Viewer, though you can filter for Ag land, the acreage descriptions are by parcel level but do not necessarily segregate out the portion of the parcel that is AG land if the total parcel is not all Ag land. 

An analysis by Reed Sims  shows: 

Total Jericho land (official Towns layer at VCGI).    =       22,726 acres 

Total Ag Cropland, Hayland, Pasture                         =    1,257 acres 

Total Other Agland (Farmstead, farm roads, etc.)   =       234 acres


FOR DISCUSSION: 
  • Do we want to preserve some of the remaining land designated as Agricultural soils? 
  • How can we best preserve the limited amount of Agricultural soil land that is left in Jericho for growing food either now or in the future? 
  • Set aside (town) land for communal food production in patches of land to support groups of households. (suggested by Christa, Settlers Farm)
  • Transition Town Jericho will ask for support at the Town Meeting for this resolution: We the citizens of Jericho propose the formation of Jericho as a vital Food Hub for the citizens of its towns and environs. A Food Hub Commission will be established to increase food self-sufficiency via the production, manufacture, and distribution of local food.
  • What are the barriers keeping you from accessing local food as much as you would like to? 
  • Do you value knowing how are growing and processing your food?
Resources
  • Transition Town Jericho Food Hub 1-30-23 A discussion ahead of Town Meeting Day (March 7), when Jericho votes on establishing a Food Commission to explore and hopefully develop a local/regional food hub. 


4b) Geography (Source Wikipedia)

Area
 • Total35.6 sq mi (92.1 km2)
 • Land35.4 sq mi (91.7 km2)
 • Water0.2 sq mi (0.4 km2)

Note: The portion of the  Firing Range that is in Jericho is 5,074 acres or 7.92 sq miles.


5.) Acres Conserved: Number of acres in Jericho that are officially conserved as of the previous year. 

  • Of the 17,700 acres of Jericho that exclude the Firing Range, 3,013 acres, or 17% of available land, is conserved from future development.
    • Municipal 326 acres
    • State 969 acres
    • Private 1,718


5b) List the public areas conserved, by title and acreage. (Mobbs (278), Riverside park, Privately owned, Research Forest (500 acres), Land trust owned, Old Mill Park (12 acres?) , Kikas Valley Farm (361 acres)...


6) Estimated Acres of land in Jericho suitable for housing development.____ for ___ acre plots and ___ for ___ acre plots. To be determined.

 Conservation history (from The History of Jericho Vol. III)

  • 1990s? Old Mill Park (12 acres) JULT to WVPD
  • 1999-2000 Mills Riverside Park (216 acres) 
  • 2000 Private land Conservation Easement Donation (JULT)
  • 2003 Wolfrun Natural Area (280 acres) JULT
  • 2009 The Gateway (123 acres added to the Wolfrun Natural Area) JULT
  • 2005 Kikas Valley Farm 280 acre donation, and other Land donations to JULT 
  • 200?? Kikas Valley Farm, additional 10 and 71-acre donations. Now, 361 acres total.  JULT
  • 2010 Barber Farm, 148 acres conserved.
Note: JULT is the Jericho Underhill Land Trust (a private, non-profit organization).


7) Estimated Water Capacity (number of housing units that can be supported) based on wells as a source of water compared to the number of units currently relying on well water. To be determined. 

RECOMMENDATION: Creating a drought monitoring system for Jericho. Create a hazard mitigation plan for droughts.

From the current town plan: Development in this area (Jericho Center) should be mindful of impacts on groundwater quality and availability and of existing historic features such as the Village Green.

From a UVM Study for Underhill (Relevant to Jericho)

Drought

Short-term droughts are expected to be more prevalent as temperatures increase, and precipitation comes in heavy downpours, reducing the opportunity for ground penetrations.

Many private wells that depend on groundwater recharge

No hazard mitigation plan for droughts

Recommend creating a drought monitoring system 

Recommend activating a communication mechanism to spread information about wells drying up, a crowdsourced drought map (for VT)

Suggest we look at NH and MA recommendations for strategies


6b) Include a statement from the Chief of the Fire Dept. regarding water supply for firefighting. Pending

Notes: Up until 1983 the town used a reservoir for water throughout the village. Then in 1983 upgrades were approved, consisting of five wells. In 1992 Champlain Water District water flowed through Jericho pipes.  

Currently, the Jericho-Underhill Water District provides drinking water and fire hydrant access to 326+ residential and business connections representing about 900 people within the District. Many if not most of the town residents rely on individual homesite wells for water today. 


8) Population (2021 American Community Survey)

  • Total: 2021 (5,082) (28th out of 277 cities in VT) Median age 48.6. 
          •  (1.7% or 86) of Jericho, families live in poverty.
            • At least one source cites the poverty level at around 4.5%
    • 2022  ( TBD )
    • *2021 (5,082) *(slight variation in numbers depending on source of data)
    • *2020 (5.075) *(slight variation in numbers depending on source of data)
    • 2019 (4,994)
    • 2018 (5,037)
    • 2017 (5,064)
    • 2016 (5,046)
    • 2015 (5,070)
    • 2014 (5,029)
    • 2013 (5,027)
    • 2012 (5,019)
    • 2011 (5,032)
    • 2000 (5,015) Numbers from here up are from American Community Survey
    • 1990 (4,302) Numbers here down are from Wikipedia
    • 1980 (3,575)
    • 1970 (2,342)
    • 1960 (1,425)
    • 1950 (1,135)
    • 1940 (1,077)
    • 1930 (1,091)
    • 1920 (1,138)
    • 1910 (1,307)
    • 1900 (1,373)
    • 1890 (1,461)
    • 1880 (1,687)
    • 1870 (1,757)
    • 1860 (1,669)
    • 1850 (1,837)
    • 1840 (1,684)
    • 1830 (1,654)
    • 1820 (1,219)
    • 1810 (1,185)
    • 1800 (   728)
    • 1790 (   381)
  • Over 18: To be determined
  • Under 18: To be determined
  • 65 and older: To be determined.
Jericho is a city located in Chittenden County Vermont. Jericho has a 2023 population of 4,822. Jericho is currently declining at a rate of -0.88% annually and its population has decreased by -4.17% since the most recent census, which recorded a population of 5,032 in 2020. Source: https://worldpopulationreview.com/us-cities/jericho-vt-population. Note the population numbers differ slightly depending on the source. 

7b) Population Projections: 5 years out, 10 years out, 15 years out, 20 years out. To be determined.

Total projections: 

By School-age categories


9) School Enrollment

K-12

  • 2023-24 (2,329)
  • 2022-23 (2,349)
  • 2021-22 (2,366)
  • 2020-21 (2,331)
  • 2019-20 (2,363)    

9b) School Capacity -

Source: John R. Alberghini, Ed.D. Superintendent, Mt. Mansfield Unified Union School District (MMUUSD)

Predicting beyond 2023-24 is not exact, because we do not know all preschool eligible students, families move in and out and a smaller percentage of 3 olds take part in private and public preschool.  A prediction would be a rough estimate with qualifiers and likely less than students who actually enroll.   

VT schools and MMUUSD have expanded programs and services such as preschool, social work, counseling support, and alternative programs over the past decade.  However, like VT as a whole, MMUUSD has experienced a decrease in K-12 enrollment over the past several years.  I can share some of our enrollment trends.  Please see below: 


10.) Biodiversity of Jericho, Vermont

  • Number of Jericho observations loaded on iNaturalist 24,799
  • Number of Species observed: 2,387 (11th place among VT cities, and towns)
    We likely have not scratched the surface of identifying the many species of vertebrates, invertebrates, birds, plants, and other life with whom we share Jericho as a home. 

   Habitat restoration and protection means life or death, even species' existence or extinction. 

Photo Gallery: Extraordinary photos of extinct or threatened invertebrates. 
Extinct & Endangered: Insects in Peril – Globally, more than 40% of insect species are in decline and a third are endangered, with their rate of extinction eight times faster than mammals. Last month British photographer Levon Biss and the American Museum of Natural History published a new book that features heavily magnified photographs of insects that are either already extinct or under severe threat. The images are extraordinary and capture a vanishing world of over 40 extinct or endangered insects. Biss spent two years photographing the insects, capturing every extraordinary detail from strands of hair to the reflection in a wing. Each individual image was created from over 10,000 photographs taken using a bespoke rig and microscope lenses. They were then layered together, producing a single shot that's fully focused and contains minute details normally invisible to the human eye. Explore the full gallery.­­­


11) I suggest the following as optional but worthy of consideration for listing in the town annual report.

  • Pounds of road salt that was used during the year. 
  • Commercial, retail establishments, and churches in Jericho by category. Including restaurants, other food-related, florists, manufacturing, retail, plant nursery/landscaping, contractors, wood-related, stables, B&Bs, libraries,  ....)
  • Artists, musicians...
  •  Prominent or Outstanding happenings Examples:  Major weather events, and large complex installations like the solar array.

12.)  Resources utilized for this report 

13.) MAPS






I WILL ALWAYS BELIEVE CARING PLUS SHARING EQUALS COMMUNITY    ~Bernie

1 comment:

  1. You have Sunwood listed as 1990. Our Sunwood home was built end of 1985/beginning of 1986 and there were houses in Sunwood that were 5 years older than ours, so I believe the development started closer to 1980.

    ReplyDelete